@trim21 would you be able to review this one? Thanks!

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.27%. Comparing base (9ac253a) to head (337f6f1).

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #230   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.26%   76.27%           
=======================================
  Files         130      129    -1     
  Lines       33913    33904    -9     
=======================================
- Hits        25865    25860    -5     
+ Misses       8048     8044    -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Thanks everyone for the reviews! I'll double-check tonight whether the changes in the comments are really needed and will either fix or merge this

also you might consider a build tool that's not setuptools ;)

it lacks some features, I've had cases where it couldn't even publish to pypi cause it lacked the new standard

also you might consider a build tool that's not setuptools ;)

it lacks some features, I've had cases where it couldn't even publish to pypi cause it lacked the new standard

Thanks a lot! I'll look into it. Do you have any suggestions for the alternative?

also you might consider a build tool that's not setuptools ;)
it lacks some features, I've had cases where it couldn't even publish to pypi cause it lacked the new standard

Thanks a lot! I'll look into it. Do you have any suggestions for the alternative?

flit-core

also you might consider a build tool that's not setuptools ;)
it lacks some features, I've had cases where it couldn't even publish to pypi cause it lacked the new standard

Thanks a lot! I'll look into it. Do you have any suggestions for the alternative?

Note to myself: redis-py uses hatchling, might worth looking into it as well.

i use hatch everywhere

it does the job without noise

but I'm not an expert in this matter and don't have a strong suggestion

We've decided to continue with hatchling. It seems to be more widely adopted. The commit related to that has been added to this PR.

did dependency-groups not work here?
i did a test and pip install --group dev works for me if dependency-groups is used in pyproject

did dependency-groups not work here? i did a test and pip install --group dev works for me if dependency-groups is used in pyproject

Hey.

Thanks for highlighting this. For some reason I thought since it was a recent addition, it would be unavailable on the older Python versions. I was wrong. I'll add it and will continue on this PR tomorrow.

did dependency-groups not work here? i did a test and pip install --group dev works for me if dependency-groups is used in pyproject

Added it in follow-up commits. Thanks for the hint!